The elusive quest for significance
Man, you guys are all so super-smart. I must confess I find it a bit intimidating at times. Formerly, I was used to being the smart one in most of the contexts in which I found myself - strange as it may sound. And I don't like being in situations where everyone is better at something than me. I like to avoid such situations. Not that I always have to be the best, but you know. I won't attempt to deny it coz it's true.
This is all part of a general trend involving me discovering more and more, as I discover more and more about the world, how insignificant I and my slight achievements really are. Sad but true. I have some talents, but I do not have genius. I will probably have little influence in the wider world beyond my circle of acquaintance. I will be forgotten within a generation or two of my death. That's the way it goes.
Kelly James Clark, whose book I have just finished reading, talks about these things, in his discussion of the creation of the self. He notes that we are brought into the world surrounded by abundant evidence that we must be the most important person in the world - within the domestic sphere that is the sum total of our experience, we are, as infants, right at the centre, with our parents satisfying our every whim. We are sheltered from any awareness of the apathetic, even hostile, outside world, the knowledge of which is too frightening for us to cope with except by learning it gradually as we grow up.
We learn of our littleness in stages. Siblings arrive and we must share our parents' attention with others; we meet other kids and find we are but one of many, and have to assert ourselves in this wider context; we try to stay on top through school, in whatever niche we can find for ourselves (academic success, popularity, sport etc.), only to find, on leaving, that the competition only gets steeper as we go on. Perhaps we find we are only average in our tertiary studies; or we excel as undergraduates, and even in postgrad, but soon find ourselves but one of many super-smart professors in our field around the world, and unable to make an impact in that sphere.
I don't think it will be my lot to be great at anything. I lack the ambition, even if I do have the skill. Perhaps all I am here to do (if I may use that terminology) is love people, be a friend and family member, drive people round the place, bake cookies, make the odd wise-crack and laugh heartily at everyone else's, help people toss around their ideas as they search for their own place in the world, and basically try to make people's lives more enjoyable if I can. Perhaps I will be able to facilitate the growth of others in various ways. Perhaps I will have the privilege of serving someone great. That will be enough for me. At least I think so. Rebuke me if you think I'm going astray here.
This is all part of a general trend involving me discovering more and more, as I discover more and more about the world, how insignificant I and my slight achievements really are. Sad but true. I have some talents, but I do not have genius. I will probably have little influence in the wider world beyond my circle of acquaintance. I will be forgotten within a generation or two of my death. That's the way it goes.
Kelly James Clark, whose book I have just finished reading, talks about these things, in his discussion of the creation of the self. He notes that we are brought into the world surrounded by abundant evidence that we must be the most important person in the world - within the domestic sphere that is the sum total of our experience, we are, as infants, right at the centre, with our parents satisfying our every whim. We are sheltered from any awareness of the apathetic, even hostile, outside world, the knowledge of which is too frightening for us to cope with except by learning it gradually as we grow up.
We learn of our littleness in stages. Siblings arrive and we must share our parents' attention with others; we meet other kids and find we are but one of many, and have to assert ourselves in this wider context; we try to stay on top through school, in whatever niche we can find for ourselves (academic success, popularity, sport etc.), only to find, on leaving, that the competition only gets steeper as we go on. Perhaps we find we are only average in our tertiary studies; or we excel as undergraduates, and even in postgrad, but soon find ourselves but one of many super-smart professors in our field around the world, and unable to make an impact in that sphere.
I don't think it will be my lot to be great at anything. I lack the ambition, even if I do have the skill. Perhaps all I am here to do (if I may use that terminology) is love people, be a friend and family member, drive people round the place, bake cookies, make the odd wise-crack and laugh heartily at everyone else's, help people toss around their ideas as they search for their own place in the world, and basically try to make people's lives more enjoyable if I can. Perhaps I will be able to facilitate the growth of others in various ways. Perhaps I will have the privilege of serving someone great. That will be enough for me. At least I think so. Rebuke me if you think I'm going astray here.

